I often hear the question "Given the low growth forecasts and all the economic worries, why is the US stock market valued so highly?"
I have explained previously how Stocks and Bonds can rise together in an environment where the Fed is artificially suppressing the yield curve.
"A democratic country equipped with a printing press won’t default. Austerity will fail when faced with seniors dying of poverty. However, it can and will engineer a huge monetary debasement via monetization of government debts (QE continued). US corporations will hoover up this money and cause a secular rise in profits & dividends. In real terms the Dow may not go up much, but in nominal terms this will translate into a huge rally, which began at SPX 666." - 11 AUGUST 2011
"US treasury bears will have to be very patient. There is plenty of drama to sit through before the final act - demonetization of US credit - is played out." - 30 OCTOBER 2011
"It is easy to see how a lower yield curve translates into higher stock prices. The "risk-free" yield curve is key to pricing of most financial assets. Its central role is in the discounting mechanism for future cash-flows. A lower yield curve means a higher Present Value for the future earnings and thus higher share prices. Note that the yield on stocks was in a secular decline, dropping WITH bond yields during the great bull market from the early 1980s to 2000. Another period when stock and bond markets rose together" - 23 JANUARY 2012
To demonstrate this mathematically, I have modelled 3 situations using a very simplistic model for a yield curve and a fixed rate for Earnings growth.
To obtain a valuation for stocks in each case, I discount the next 10 years earnings to their PV and sum them up. The Initial Earnings are normalised to 100, just to illustrate the principle.
Case 1: "Normal" growth and interest rates - e.g. mid 2007
Earnings Model
|
|||
Initial Earnings
|
100
|
||
Growth Rate
|
3.00%
|
||
Yield Curve Model
|
|||
Level
|
3.00%
|
||
Steepness
|
0.25%
|
||
Curvature
|
0.50%
|
||
Year
|
US Yield
|
Earnings
|
Earnings PV
|
1
|
3.22%
|
103.00
|
99.78
|
2
|
3.57%
|
106.09
|
98.91
|
3
|
3.89%
|
109.27
|
97.46
|
4
|
4.20%
|
112.55
|
95.48
|
5
|
4.50%
|
115.93
|
93.03
|
6
|
4.70%
|
119.41
|
90.66
|
7
|
4.89%
|
122.99
|
88.06
|
8
|
5.07%
|
126.68
|
85.31
|
9
|
5.22%
|
130.48
|
82.51
|
10
|
5.25%
|
134.39
|
80.57
|
SPX
|
1,180.78
|
911.77
|
Case 2: Deflation + Credit Crunch, inverted yield curve, falling earnings - e.g. late 2008
Earnings Model
|
|||
Initial Earnings
|
100
|
||
Growth Rate
|
-4.00%
|
||
Yield Curve Model
|
|||
Level
|
6.00%
|
||
Steepness
|
-0.50%
|
||
Curvature
|
-1.00%
|
||
Year
|
US Yield
|
Earnings
|
Earnings PV
|
1
|
5.55%
|
96.00
|
90.95
|
2
|
4.87%
|
92.16
|
83.80
|
3
|
4.23%
|
88.47
|
78.14
|
4
|
3.61%
|
84.93
|
73.71
|
5
|
3.00%
|
81.54
|
70.33
|
6
|
2.61%
|
78.28
|
67.08
|
7
|
2.23%
|
75.14
|
64.41
|
8
|
1.87%
|
72.14
|
62.21
|
9
|
1.55%
|
69.25
|
60.29
|
10
|
1.50%
|
66.48
|
57.29
|
SPX
|
804.40
|
708.23
|
Case 3: Low growth, with Fed manipulated low rates - e.g. mid 2012
Earnings Model
|
|||
Initial Earnings
|
100
|
||
Growth Rate
|
1.00%
|
||
Yield Curve Model
|
|||
Level
|
0.00%
|
||
Steepness
|
0.15%
|
||
Curvature
|
0.30%
|
||
Year
|
US Yield
|
Earnings
|
Earnings PV
|
1
|
0.13%
|
101.00
|
100.86
|
2
|
0.34%
|
102.01
|
101.32
|
3
|
0.53%
|
103.03
|
101.40
|
4
|
0.72%
|
104.06
|
101.12
|
5
|
0.90%
|
105.10
|
100.50
|
6
|
1.02%
|
106.15
|
99.89
|
7
|
1.13%
|
107.21
|
99.09
|
8
|
1.24%
|
108.29
|
98.12
|
9
|
1.33%
|
109.37
|
97.07
|
10
|
1.35%
|
110.46
|
96.60
|
SPX
|
1,056.68
|
995.98
|
1 comment:
Post a Comment