The $200-Trillion Debt Which Cannot Be Named
If the Western monetary system were a person, it would long ago have been declared clinically insane and shipped off to an asylum. What is worse is the conspiracy of silence about the "real" US debt, which we have to assume parallels at least partially the debt of other Western nations. The whole of the West is busted, pretty much – and the "austerity" plans being put in place are just more window-dressing, albeit of a very nasty sort.
Sunday, 31 October 2010
Sunday, 17 October 2010
India's conundrum - High Growth and High Inflation
This speech by Dr Subir Gokarn (Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India ) is fairly typical. Take for instance the following statement:
I will begin by discussing the current inflationary scenario in India, which, as we have been saying in our recent assessments, is not very reassuring. I will then place this scenario in a broad historical context, with the intention of demonstrating that India has a good record of reining inflation in, regardless of what has driven it.
Anyone who doesn't know that inflation in India has always run rampant is either lying, or deluding himself with false statistics. All he is doing in his speech is to talk on about the components of inflation and a brief history of how it occurred.
To me this speech is the equivalent of a layman standing beside a volcano talking about the what happened during an eruption. He is describing the ash, smoke and fire. However he has no understanding of the geology behind volcanic eruptions or how to predict them.
So, what really explains the unusually high inflation in India? To understand inflation you have to understand the most important thing about inflation. And that is the following statement by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz, made in their influential book, A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960:
The above statement provides a clear explanation and a solution to the problem of inflation in India as below:
Comments welcome. Feel free to distribute this to others.
I will begin by discussing the current inflationary scenario in India, which, as we have been saying in our recent assessments, is not very reassuring. I will then place this scenario in a broad historical context, with the intention of demonstrating that India has a good record of reining inflation in, regardless of what has driven it.
Anyone who doesn't know that inflation in India has always run rampant is either lying, or deluding himself with false statistics. All he is doing in his speech is to talk on about the components of inflation and a brief history of how it occurred.
To me this speech is the equivalent of a layman standing beside a volcano talking about the what happened during an eruption. He is describing the ash, smoke and fire. However he has no understanding of the geology behind volcanic eruptions or how to predict them.
So, what really explains the unusually high inflation in India? To understand inflation you have to understand the most important thing about inflation. And that is the following statement by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz, made in their influential book, A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960:
Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon
"Friedman advocated a central bank policy aimed at keeping the supply and demand for money at equilibrium, as measured by growth in productivity and demand. The monetarist argument that the demand for money is a stable function gained considerable support during the late 1960s and 1970s from the work of David Laidler. The former head of the United States Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, is generally regarded as monetarist in his policy orientation. The European Central Bank officially bases its monetary policy on money supply targets. " - WikipediaThe above statement provides a clear explanation and a solution to the problem of inflation in India as below:
- Friedman says that inflation is due to money supply growth outstripping economic growth
- A free-market economy has a natural DEFLATIONARY tendency due to innovation and efficiency.
- Inflation is neither a precondition for, nor a consequence of sustainable growth in an economy.
- When growth is accompanied by inflation it is a sure sign of a disproportionate growth in the supply of money
- Inevitably this due to a DISPROPORTIONATE GROWTH in BANK CREDIT.
- When banks lend short-term deposits over the long-term, it causes a growth in DEMAND DEPOSITS through the money multiplication mechanism.
- These new deposits bid up the prices of goods and services because they appear in advance of an increase in production of new goods and services.
- This MONETARY GROWTH shows up in the monetary statistics as an increase in the money multiplier.
- Traditional central banking policy instruments such as tinkering with reserve requirements and raising repo-rates can not effectively restrict this credit expansion. Credit demand is a function of CONFIDENCE. The central bank can only dampen this confidence to a small extent.
- Fast growing liquidity created by this credit growth fuels a high demand for a slow-growth in the quantity goods and services. This creates a feedback loop that increases CONFIDENCE further as businesses seek further bank credit to meet this demand.
- This feedback loop increases the money supply further. In due course this process creates a CREDIT FUELED BOOM in the economy.
- A CREDIT FUELED BOOM is typically accompanied by high inflation and assets bubbles. Witness the stock markets and property markets, wherein assets are priced above what is economically justifiable.
- Eventually this BOOM turns to a BUST as frenzied investment in capacity outstrips real demand and highly leveraged businesses end up with no customers.
- MISALLOCATED capital is written off. This BUST causes a disaster on the commercial banking system's balance sheet.
- Addicted to easy credit the commercial bankers and industry will cry for bailouts and claim "NO ONE SAW THIS COMING."
- Austrian economists will say "We did" and point to many versions of the above explanation that are ignored by the mainstream.
- At this point Central Banks panic. They lower interest rates, inject liquidity, purchase distressed assets and print money.
- Slowly, confidence will return. Low interest rates will fuel the next asset bubble and/or credit boom.
- This time it will be worse because the entire system will expect the bailout even though they know the boom is unsustainable. This is a moral hazard which will lead to a generation of "Fed-watchers" who spout absurd things like "bad new is good because it will result in QE-II".
- A sustainable economic system is possible - where virtuous, sustainable growth is driven through capital markets, not bank credit.
- Growth is accompanied by low inflation because money supply only increases to finance clearing of goods through self-liquidating credit, and not to finance capital expenditure.
- In a sustainable system, investment of SAVINGS (deferred consumption) in capital goods and assets is NOT accompanied by any increase in DEMAND DEPOSITS.
- In a sustainable system, BANK CREDIT only expands to satisfy demand for SELF-LIQUIDATING CREDIT. The venerable Letter of Credit system can expand bank credit efficiently to FINANCE the PRODUCTION and DISTRIBUTION of consumer goods in immediate demand. Its shrinks bank credit when this demand is satisfied.
- In a sustainable system, CAPITAL INVESTMENT, including asset purchases, factors and facilities of production takes place in CAPITAL MARKETS, away from the commercial banking system.
- Therefore, the solution to India's inflation problem is fairly simple:
Restrict COMMERCIAL BANK LENDING to financing the production and distribution of goods via self-liquidating credit.
... OR ALTERNATELY ADOPT A FREE MARKET APPROACH AS FOLLOWS ...
... OR ALTERNATELY ADOPT A FREE MARKET APPROACH AS FOLLOWS ...
- Open the mint to gold and silver. Issue the Indian Golden Rupee 100% backed by Gold and the Indian Silver Rupee 100% backed by silver. Declare them to be legal tender. There will be no further need for a central bank issued, debt-backed paper currency.
- This one act will unlock India's biggest asset - the capital that is currently lying idle in India's enormous private gold hordes amounting to 25,0000 tons. A fraction of this will prove to be more than sufficient to power India's growth.
- Dissolve the Reserve Bank of India. The absence of a lender of last resort during financial panics will automatically teach commercial banks to restrict lending to the highly marketable, self-liquidating credit that finances the production of semi-finished goods on their way to satisfy immediate consumer demand.
- The only notes in circulation will be those issued by commercial banks, not the RBI. The market will judge the health of a bank by discounting its notes just it does for any other corporation.
Comments welcome. Feel free to distribute this to others.
Sunday, 30 March 2008
How to stabilise the economic system
The origin of the boom and bust business cycle and the inherent instability of the modern financial system is due to the fractional-reserve banking system.
Banks and investment houses borrow short-term and lend long-term. This undercuts the very foundation of capitalism by distorting the price of long-term credit. For capitalism to work, the term structure of credit should accurately reflect the economy's time preference for future consumption - i.e. how much are people are putting away for future consumption and in what time frame.
Industry relies on an accurate signal from the capital markets to plan future production. Easy availability of long-term capital for industrial projects implies future demand. Scarcity of long-term capital implies no new projects should be undertaken because there are no savings which will absorb the additional production.
Borrowing short-term to lend long term creates an illusion of long-term savings where there are none. The resulting economic activity is doomed to fail because the consumption promised by the capital markets will never materialize. The bust that we face now is a necessary corollary to the boom. Nothing can be done to prevent it. All that the central bank and government interventions will do is to redistribute (read socialize) the pain.
To fix the system we have to take away the powers of banks to change the term structure of capital. After that laissez-faire policies with suffice.
Banks and investment houses borrow short-term and lend long-term. This undercuts the very foundation of capitalism by distorting the price of long-term credit. For capitalism to work, the term structure of credit should accurately reflect the economy's time preference for future consumption - i.e. how much are people are putting away for future consumption and in what time frame.
Industry relies on an accurate signal from the capital markets to plan future production. Easy availability of long-term capital for industrial projects implies future demand. Scarcity of long-term capital implies no new projects should be undertaken because there are no savings which will absorb the additional production.
Borrowing short-term to lend long term creates an illusion of long-term savings where there are none. The resulting economic activity is doomed to fail because the consumption promised by the capital markets will never materialize. The bust that we face now is a necessary corollary to the boom. Nothing can be done to prevent it. All that the central bank and government interventions will do is to redistribute (read socialize) the pain.
To fix the system we have to take away the powers of banks to change the term structure of capital. After that laissez-faire policies with suffice.
Monday, 18 June 2007
Friday, 15 June 2007
Three years of rate rises - keeping the $ afloat

Over the past 5 years, the dollar has lost 30% against the pound and 20% against the Rupee.
In Nov 2003 the outlook for the dollar then (as now) was very bad indeed. Over the next four months the dollar slid 15% against the pound.
This was a MAJOR slide for the dollar, not just against the pound but against all currencies. For instance, the Reserve Bank of India had to keep the Rupee low otherwise Indian exporters would lose ground against the Chinese (who had a fixed exchange rate against the dollar) but the selling pressure on the dollar was massive. By April 2004 the dollar was down 12% to the Rupee from the start of the chart and looking to go further.
At this time, the US interest rates had been low because the Federal Reserve was trying to pump up the money supply in the economy to help it grow out of the post Sept 11th/dot-com bust slowdown. Although the Fed just about managed to prevent a recession, it created massive debt and a massive property & equity bubble as consumers and hedge funds took advantage of the low rates to borrow way too much to acquire houses and stocks.
Since the US was (and is still) running HUGE trade and budget deficits, it desperately needed some way to attract continue to attract foreign loans to finance these deficits. However, no one wants to loan to a falling currency and this can cause a downward spiral on the dollar value which would have been a cause for recession and inflation.
To stem the dollar decline the Fed was forced to announce the end of easy credit and had to start steeply increase interest rates from Spring 2004 (see chart below). The dollar "bounced" and stabilised as the world rolled back their oversold positions in the dollar. As the tightening cycle proceeded, the dollar "only" lost 10% against the pound over 2 years (until mid-2006) and held steady against the Rupee.

However, since the tightening has stopped, the dollar has resumed its decline and has again lost 10-15% against both the Pound and the Rupee.
At this point the Fed is between a rock and a hard place. Further rate hikes will worsen the property price falls across the US, reduce consumer spending, and lead to a recession.
NOT hiking rates on the other hand will cause the dollar to continue its downward path, losing about 10% an year. If the markets decide that a loss of 10% a year is not worth the 5% interest they get in US treasuries (which to me is a no brainer but Saudis & Chinese seem to be kinder than I am to the US), the dollar decline will accelerate. So any which way you look at it, the risk of holding dollars is too much unless you have some sort of political favour you are doing to the US.
Stick your monies in Rupees/Pounds/Euros/Gold until then. If you are in the U.S., you can do this if you have a brokerage account. Just purchase a Gold Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) (Symbols: GLD or IAU; Charts: http://finance.google.com/finance?q=IAU). Generally, gold goes up when the dollar goes down. A currency ETF can give you convenient exposure to other currencies, but the best idea is to get an excellent Fixed Deposit in India which will give you nearly 10% per year via your NRO account. You can bring back $50k per year so don't worry about the NRE/NRO distinction.
It would be a great idea to get a dollar loan to purchase gold. What you pay in interest will more than compensated for by the likely decline of the dollar while you are paying it back.
Tuesday, 3 April 2007
Farmer suicides, debt and inflation
On the first page of every NCERT book is Gandhiji's famous talisman:
"RECALL THE FACE OF THE POOREST AND THE WEAKEST MAN WHOM YOU MAY HAVE SEEN AND ASK YOURSELF IF THE STEP YOU CONTEMPLATE IS GOING TO BE OF ANY USE TO HIM."
I was reminded of this talisman when I looked at these hopeless faces (please, take a look) of farmers demonstrating in Janter Manter. They come from , all over the country to talk about the problem of 'karza' (debt) which has blighted their lives. Debt leaves them so vulnerable to destitution that many of them are driven to suicide in despair and hopelessness.
I asked myself, are these not the faces Gandhiji asked us to think of? Can the talisman be applied to our monetary policy so it gives these people hope and security?
Our money - the Indian Rupee
The Rupee is the legal tender for the country, which means that it is the only currency in which creditors can legally expect payments. Borrows are not legally required to repay debts in any other form (e.g. gold, silver, dollars, grain, pounds of flesh, etc.). This ensures that financial institutions such as banks and credit societies only extend Rupee loans to the general economy. Additionally, our Government expects tax to be paid in Rupees.
These legal reasons ensure that the Rupee becomes the primary, if not the only medium of economic exchange in the Indian economy. Other forms of payment, which would otherwise naturally gain currency simply do not - for two reasons.
First, credit extended in these forms of payment is not legally protected thus placing them at a significant disadvantage.
Second, any commercial transactions using them usually involves payment of taxes in Rupees rendering such transaction highly inconvenient.
So where do Rupees come from?
Step 1 - Creation of Money
Rupees come into existence as debt created by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The RBI has a legal monopoly on debt creation. This debt is multiplied through the banking system, and is largely consumed by high-earning (i.e., credit-worthy) companies or individuals. Rupees enter circulation when these individuals or companies acquire assets, or purchase goods and services.
Interest Rates
Like most 'growth-oriented' central banks, the RBI encourages increasing consumption of debt by lowering interest rates. Lower rates encourage individuals to borrow and acquire assets or spend money. Entrepreneurs take advantage of the cheaper credit to expand or start businesses. This new debt (money) enters circulation and stimulates demand for goods and services.
Note: It is important to understand that EVERY rupee comes into circulation as DEBT (karza) issued by the banking system. This DEBT must be repaid with INTEREST back to the banks. Since the interest MUST ALSO come from the same circulation, the debt can never be paid back fully. The interest can only be paid if all of us take on MORE DEBT from the banks!!
Eventually, our debt-based money supply MUST always result in defaults - since the banks cannot lend to us forever. So the weakest sections of society (such as farmers) and industry (leveraged or low-margain businesses) are forced to default on their debt. The effects of this are ugly - farmer suicides, foreclosures of houses, appropriation of industrial assets by the banks, restructurings, layoffs, etc.
DEBT-based money is widely confused with CREDIT-creation. Credit is deferred payment for consumption of goods or services and it is a useful for promoting growth and consumption. Credit can easily be created with an asset-backed currency such as gold or silver. Credit created with such currencies doesn't result in the odious side-effects described above.
Step 2 - Inflation
This debt-creation results in inflation of the supply of money in circulation. Had the production of goods and services neither grown nor become more efficient, the rate of money supply inflation would have exactly equalled the rate of price inflation (Note: By price inflation I mean the prices of ALL goods and services in EXACT proportion to their consumption, not the CPI and other misleading indicators used by the government). This is in strict accordance with normal rules of supply and demand.
Step 3 - Price Bubbles
This price inflation is reflected in either assets prices (e.g. stocks, property, tulips even :) ), or commodities (e.g. food, energy, metals), or both. This is because demand (money) for these is systemically created before the assets, goods and services themselves are created, regardless of whether they are ever created. Dynamic sectors of the economy (such as manufacturing and services) respond to this stimulus and create goods and services to satisfy the new demand, but other sectors like agriculture cannot grow as quickly.
A vast majority of our people are not able to participate in this growth (such as farmers and pensioners), because they cannot create new goods and services, for lack of ability or opportunity. In the face of price inflation they are squeezed by costs that grow faster than their incomes. They must must work harder and harder simply to maintain their living standards.
Step 4 - Inflation Targeting and the Bust
Eventually, inflation rises above RBI targets and becomes a concern. Interest rates are tentatively raised to try and curb price inflation. From unnaturally low rates we slowly go to unnaturally high rates. This puts a slow squeeze on the general access to debt for the economy. The economically vulnerable flounder while the affluent continue to borrow and inflate prices. Debt become more onerous for the weaker sections as rates go up and the 'karza' burden increases as the poorest find they cannot earn from other sections of society to the money to repay the debt.
Farmers start taking their lives, pensioners slowly descend into poverty, asset prices weaken and asset bubbles pop, hapless investors lose their savings in the stock or housing markets, businesses that were viable during low interest rate regimes become unviable and are shut-down leading to job losses, and the contagion spreads through the entire economy leading to a bust.
Exploiting the Weak
So we see that in the whole business cycle triggered by easy money it is the woes of the most vulnerable and most ignorant that are multiplied. The system is stacked in favour of the cleverest and most productive people - the unnatural boom-bust cycle in the economy is created solely by giving everyone access to cheap debt and then withdrawing it when prices rise.
This monetary system is the OPPOSITE of what Gandhiji's talisman tells us to do. We have chosen to create a system that causes economic disruption of the most wretched and vulnerable individuals and industries, through interest rate uncertainties, boom and bust cycles and inflation. Common decency demands is that if our monetary system cannot help improve their lives, we choose a system that, at least, does them no harm.
"RECALL THE FACE OF THE POOREST AND THE WEAKEST MAN WHOM YOU MAY HAVE SEEN AND ASK YOURSELF IF THE STEP YOU CONTEMPLATE IS GOING TO BE OF ANY USE TO HIM."
I was reminded of this talisman when I looked at these hopeless faces (please, take a look) of farmers demonstrating in Janter Manter. They come from , all over the country to talk about the problem of 'karza' (debt) which has blighted their lives. Debt leaves them so vulnerable to destitution that many of them are driven to suicide in despair and hopelessness.
I asked myself, are these not the faces Gandhiji asked us to think of? Can the talisman be applied to our monetary policy so it gives these people hope and security?
Our money - the Indian Rupee
The Rupee is the legal tender for the country, which means that it is the only currency in which creditors can legally expect payments. Borrows are not legally required to repay debts in any other form (e.g. gold, silver, dollars, grain, pounds of flesh, etc.). This ensures that financial institutions such as banks and credit societies only extend Rupee loans to the general economy. Additionally, our Government expects tax to be paid in Rupees.
These legal reasons ensure that the Rupee becomes the primary, if not the only medium of economic exchange in the Indian economy. Other forms of payment, which would otherwise naturally gain currency simply do not - for two reasons.
First, credit extended in these forms of payment is not legally protected thus placing them at a significant disadvantage.
Second, any commercial transactions using them usually involves payment of taxes in Rupees rendering such transaction highly inconvenient.
So where do Rupees come from?
Step 1 - Creation of Money
Rupees come into existence as debt created by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The RBI has a legal monopoly on debt creation. This debt is multiplied through the banking system, and is largely consumed by high-earning (i.e., credit-worthy) companies or individuals. Rupees enter circulation when these individuals or companies acquire assets, or purchase goods and services.
Interest Rates
Like most 'growth-oriented' central banks, the RBI encourages increasing consumption of debt by lowering interest rates. Lower rates encourage individuals to borrow and acquire assets or spend money. Entrepreneurs take advantage of the cheaper credit to expand or start businesses. This new debt (money) enters circulation and stimulates demand for goods and services.
Note: It is important to understand that EVERY rupee comes into circulation as DEBT (karza) issued by the banking system. This DEBT must be repaid with INTEREST back to the banks. Since the interest MUST ALSO come from the same circulation, the debt can never be paid back fully. The interest can only be paid if all of us take on MORE DEBT from the banks!!
Eventually, our debt-based money supply MUST always result in defaults - since the banks cannot lend to us forever. So the weakest sections of society (such as farmers) and industry (leveraged or low-margain businesses) are forced to default on their debt. The effects of this are ugly - farmer suicides, foreclosures of houses, appropriation of industrial assets by the banks, restructurings, layoffs, etc.
DEBT-based money is widely confused with CREDIT-creation. Credit is deferred payment for consumption of goods or services and it is a useful for promoting growth and consumption. Credit can easily be created with an asset-backed currency such as gold or silver. Credit created with such currencies doesn't result in the odious side-effects described above.
Step 2 - Inflation
This debt-creation results in inflation of the supply of money in circulation. Had the production of goods and services neither grown nor become more efficient, the rate of money supply inflation would have exactly equalled the rate of price inflation (Note: By price inflation I mean the prices of ALL goods and services in EXACT proportion to their consumption, not the CPI and other misleading indicators used by the government). This is in strict accordance with normal rules of supply and demand.
Step 3 - Price Bubbles
This price inflation is reflected in either assets prices (e.g. stocks, property, tulips even :) ), or commodities (e.g. food, energy, metals), or both. This is because demand (money) for these is systemically created before the assets, goods and services themselves are created, regardless of whether they are ever created. Dynamic sectors of the economy (such as manufacturing and services) respond to this stimulus and create goods and services to satisfy the new demand, but other sectors like agriculture cannot grow as quickly.
A vast majority of our people are not able to participate in this growth (such as farmers and pensioners), because they cannot create new goods and services, for lack of ability or opportunity. In the face of price inflation they are squeezed by costs that grow faster than their incomes. They must must work harder and harder simply to maintain their living standards.
Step 4 - Inflation Targeting and the Bust
Eventually, inflation rises above RBI targets and becomes a concern. Interest rates are tentatively raised to try and curb price inflation. From unnaturally low rates we slowly go to unnaturally high rates. This puts a slow squeeze on the general access to debt for the economy. The economically vulnerable flounder while the affluent continue to borrow and inflate prices. Debt become more onerous for the weaker sections as rates go up and the 'karza' burden increases as the poorest find they cannot earn from other sections of society to the money to repay the debt.
Farmers start taking their lives, pensioners slowly descend into poverty, asset prices weaken and asset bubbles pop, hapless investors lose their savings in the stock or housing markets, businesses that were viable during low interest rate regimes become unviable and are shut-down leading to job losses, and the contagion spreads through the entire economy leading to a bust.
Exploiting the Weak
So we see that in the whole business cycle triggered by easy money it is the woes of the most vulnerable and most ignorant that are multiplied. The system is stacked in favour of the cleverest and most productive people - the unnatural boom-bust cycle in the economy is created solely by giving everyone access to cheap debt and then withdrawing it when prices rise.
This monetary system is the OPPOSITE of what Gandhiji's talisman tells us to do. We have chosen to create a system that causes economic disruption of the most wretched and vulnerable individuals and industries, through interest rate uncertainties, boom and bust cycles and inflation. Common decency demands is that if our monetary system cannot help improve their lives, we choose a system that, at least, does them no harm.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)